# About Wolverine Clinic — Independent editorial project on the BPC-157 + TB-500 blend

> Wolverine Clinic is an independent editorial project that publishes summaries of the peer-reviewed research literature on the BPC-157 + TB-500 blend. Not a clinic. Not a vendor. No medical advice.

What the publisher is, what it isn't, and how it sources the material on this site.

## What Wolverine Clinic is

Wolverine Clinic is an independent editorial project that publishes summaries of the peer-reviewed research literature on the BPC-157 + TB-500 blend (the so-called Wolverine stack) and its two components. The site exists to give readers — human and machine — a single, citation-dense place to read the published research on this combination without the noise that surrounds it in vendor copy, forum threads, and social media.

The publisher is not a clinic. It does not employ clinicians and does not provide medical advice. It does not manufacture, sell, distribute, broker, or refer for any product. Its work is editorial commentary on publicly available science. Every quantitative claim on the site is sourced to a primary research paper, listed in the references index with DOI and PubMed link.

The word 'clinic' in the domain name is editorial framing — a position the publisher occupies relative to the literature, in the sense of a research-literature clinic or technical reading room. It is not a claim that the site provides clinical services, runs a medical practice, or treats patients.

## What it isn't

Specifically, Wolverine Clinic is not:

— a medical clinic, hospital, or practice;

— a pharmacy, compounding pharmacy, or distributor;

— a vendor of BPC-157, TB-500, the Wolverine blend, or any other research compound;

— a telehealth or prescription service;

— a substitute for a qualified medical professional;

— affiliated with Marvel Entertainment, the *Wolverine* / X-Men franchise, or any related trademark holder. The nickname 'Wolverine' for the BPC-157 + TB-500 blend is a community label used in research and discussion forums; it is used here in that descriptive sense only.

Nothing on this site is medical advice. Nothing on this site is an offer to sell anything.

## Editorial standards and sourcing

Every claim on the site is tied to a citation in the references index. The sources are weighted in this order of preference: peer-reviewed primary research articles (PubMed-indexed), peer-reviewed systematic reviews and scoping reviews, official regulatory documents (FDA, WADA), and authoritative reference works.

When the published evidence is sparse — as it is, for example, for the BPC-157 + TB-500 combination specifically — the site says so. When the evidence is strong in one model but unreplicated in another, the site says that too. The voice across the site is meant to be the engineering-drawing register implied by the design: specific, sourced, restrained.

The site does not write opinion. It does not write recommendations. It does not endorse vendors or products. It does not promote off-label or unapproved use of any compound. Where the published research literature contains gaps, uncertainties, or active disputes, the site reports them as such rather than papering over them.

---

Editorial summaries of published research — not clinical guidance, not a vendor, not a prescription service.